Windows 10
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 3:03 pm
The new Windows has been getting mixed reviews.
Any (relevant) thoughts?
Any (relevant) thoughts?
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 3:07 pm
Since getting g it, the touch pad mouse thing has stopped working on my laptop
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 3:10 pm
I used it the other day. Horrific.
Posted: Sun Aug 09, 2015 3:12 pm
My house only has 8 Windows. 
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:31 pm
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 2:55 pm
In theory, based on the 'one good, then one bad' thing Macrocruft do, it should be good. Well, as good as an operating system that has a core with it's roots in mid 1980's tech can be in this day and age. I'm sure people will love it or something.
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 5:36 pm
Updated my year-old laptop last week (i7, 16GB ram) and it seems faster generally, and Lightroom 5.7 runs quicker as well.
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 6:04 pm
I hate to be a shill but I just booted up a 6 year old Macbook Pro running OSX 10.9 (not the current major release) and it is faster than my grandad's 2 week old Windows 10 Acer jobbie. 
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 6:16 pm
I expect the Mac cost five times as much as the PC in the first placeDonald wrote:I hate to be a shill but I just booted up a 6 year old Macbook Pro running OSX 10.9 (not the current major release) and it is faster than my grandad's 2 week old Windows 10 Acer jobbie.
Posted: Mon Aug 10, 2015 6:32 pm
True, you're not far off, but the majority of that is on the name I'm sure. To throw in some more weight my 4 year old Pro with half the RAM and ~9 month old Air are also quicker. That said, the Air is PCIe-based rather than whatever the spinning ones are called.
The point is an out of date 6 year old laptop shouldn't be running quicker than a brand new laptop with the latest OS, regardless of cost. I would like to think the Intel Core 2 processor (in the 6 year old) would be spanked by the latest Celeron as well.
I'm sure, I hope, @indigolemon can lend some support to this hypothesis, though.
Anyway, I don't like Windows 10. It's pretty gross.
The point is an out of date 6 year old laptop shouldn't be running quicker than a brand new laptop with the latest OS, regardless of cost. I would like to think the Intel Core 2 processor (in the 6 year old) would be spanked by the latest Celeron as well.
I'm sure, I hope, @indigolemon can lend some support to this hypothesis, though.
Anyway, I don't like Windows 10. It's pretty gross.