1/4 times of other cars.
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:03 pm
1992 Honda Prelude Si 4WS 7.8 15.90
1994 Honda Prelude VTEC 7.2 15.10
1995 Honda Prelude VTEC 6.7 15.10
Does not seem quite right to me?
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 2:39 pm
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:21 pm
Seems ok to me.
One must be auto with all extra.?
One must be auto with all extra.?
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:29 pm
are they saying 4ws is not good for the strip?
thought honda prelude SI was vtec?
auto would be extra sec on that, accoring to stats anyway
thought honda prelude SI was vtec?
auto would be extra sec on that, accoring to stats anyway
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:31 pm
^^ The USDM 4G SI was the 2.3.
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:33 pm
And the '94 v's '95 different 0-60 but same qtr mile?
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:40 pm
Might be a load if s**t
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:52 pm
The 88 Prelude is about right mine did it in 16.4 secs but it has 15 more horses than the US version. The 3.0 BMW Z4's are abit questionable though they are rated as a 0-62 of 5.9 secs so dunno how people are shaving half a second off the times 
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 6:04 pm
13.6 in a glanza turbo
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2012 8:47 pm
There are probably loads of anomalies. For example, the Nissan 100NX 2 litre we have is quicker off the mark than both the ATR and the Lude, but only by a gnat's ...
until vtec claws the gap back ...
but only by a gnat's
until vtec claws the gap back ...
but only by a gnat's