Page 1 of 2
H22a running rich,
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:14 pm
by bb4life
Hi all, ive got a '94 bb4 jdm prelude, today i took it for its mot after its been standing a while and it failed on the emmissions due to running rich, its just had an oil change, filter, fuel filter, new cambelt, manual tensioner conversion, air filter, its also got a custom made 4 branch manifold, and down pipe, i have also cleaned the egr valve out, although not the ports, can anyone point me to what it could be? Also between 2000-4000 rpm it bogs slightly, it seems that alot of h22's have this problem, but any advice would be fantastic! Many thanks!
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:17 pm
by 4thgenphil
does it have a cat?
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:26 pm
by Dbo
don't know about the bogging but please tell me that when you changed the cambelt you also done the waterpump

if not watch it carefully

they don't like being messed with and go in about a month if not done.
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:37 pm
by bb4life
Hi, it does have a cat, and the waterpump was done, thanks for the help guys
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:41 pm
by Pushki
O2 sensor?

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:50 pm
by 4thgenphil
Pushki wrote:O2 sensor?

my first thoughts TBH
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 7:52 pm
by vti2003
Not sure about the running rich bit - could be o2 sensor - but the bogging seems to be a common problem with no single solution.
I finally solved mine 90% by swapping the TPS - you can check if it is that by unplugging it and driving the car. You will get a Engine Light come on if you do. If the car drives loads better then that could be the problem.
The other issue I had that finally solved the problem was HT Leads. I changed mine twice and it ran badly, first were blueprint leads second were from Euro Car Parts - can't remember the name.
I was never happy with them - they didn't seem to click over the plugs properly. Even after adjusting them.
Having tried the motor factor ones and found they were rubbish I had a look on Ebay . I spoke to a guy selling some on ebay locally to me and he assured me if I wasn't happy he would refund me. It was these.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/8MM-RED-SILIC ... 5d3918fa2c
Fitted them and they clicked on properly and firmly and the difference was like night and day. Runs perfectly now.

Even sounds better (a LOT better

)
And no - I honestly don't know the seller
I have also cleaned out the EGR system, cleaned and refitted or changed most sensors around the engine done valve clearances etc etc. It all seems to add up a bit at a time to a car that runs great now. The biggest difference was 100% the TPS followed by the leads. I came to the conclusion the TPS was reading right on the multimeter when checked manually but during operation had a worn part that was giving dodgy readings.
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:02 pm
by Dbo
seems a bit dumb but why the cat? on a 94 BB4 you don't have to have a cat (i think) free's up the engine alot

and in a non cat mot emmisions not a problem
you pay the extra on the insurance for a JDM might as well use all the stuff the UKDM's cant have

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:07 pm
by bb4life
Yea i will remove the cat im just waiting for the de cat to appear with the ss exhaust system

Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2013 8:43 pm
by bristol_bb4
I can honestly say I didn't notice any difference at all after putting my cat back on for the mot and I've got a full fujitsubo system

Turbo cars benefit for sure but n\a's mmmmmm not do much I don't think
