Page 1 of 2
fujitsubo vs mugen vs ATR exhaust mani
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 6:56 pm
by 4thgenphil
ok, i happened to have all 3 of the mentioned manifolds, question is which is best? and how much better are the fujitsubo/mugen over the ATR one?
cheers for your input
love
phil
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 6:58 pm
by stk prelude
fuj and mugen for sure.. i wouldn't even think ATR is even close to the other two
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:16 pm
by LewisH
You have too much. lol
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:21 pm
by vanzep
discount the atr mani
fuji or mugen is a difficult choice
depends on condition - some pics would help
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:36 pm
by craig_jdm
dyno all three will be very expensive for you but interesting for us
Posted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 7:40 pm
by RattyMcClelland
ATR will be less restrictive than stock but still not great assuming its the same as the Type S in design.
Even the Mugen IMO wouldnt be the best. But still great.
I think the Fuji is the dark horse.
But unless its Hytech its wrong.
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:39 pm
by NafemanNathan
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say Mugen and Fuji will be the same.
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 1:49 pm
by 4thgenphil
NafemanNathan wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here and say Mugen and Fuji will be the same.
they do look very similar
how much better than a standard ATR Manifold do you think either will be, will it be worth the hassle of making it fit?
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:04 pm
by NafemanNathan
On a standard ATR engine with a decent catback exhaust and decat you'd probably see an extra 5-10 bhp I recon. The ATR manifold is superior over a standard Prelude mani because of the larger primaries and that, but it's still a mass produced cast item at the end of the day, so they all have their defects and casting marks.
How much work is required to make the Mugen or Fuji fit? Is it just cross-member clearance?
Posted: Sat Jun 29, 2013 2:37 pm
by RattyMcClelland
I wouldnt even consider the ATR manifold if i had the fuji and mugen.