
Congratulations to vtecmec for winning May/June's Lude Of The Month, with his DIY Turbo BB1 build.
>>> Click Here For Profile <<<

>>> Click Here For Profile <<<

skunk 2 mani
- si import
- Supporter 2016
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 4:47 pm
- My Generation: 4G
- Location: Essex
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
I think you have to get the car mapped afterwards to make the most of it.
I have one with I keep thinking about fitting.
I have one with I keep thinking about fitting.
http://www.ludegeneration.co.uk/profile ... t4910.html
BB4 Si Vtec LSD . 263.4 bhp - 192.7 lb/ft .13.5@105mph
BB1 Si Vtec LSD. R.I.P . 1/4mile 14.1451 secs @ 99.71mph
BB4 Si Vtec LSD Turbo . R.I.P

BB4 Si Vtec LSD . 263.4 bhp - 192.7 lb/ft .13.5@105mph
BB1 Si Vtec LSD. R.I.P . 1/4mile 14.1451 secs @ 99.71mph
BB4 Si Vtec LSD Turbo . R.I.P

- Froidas
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:11 am
- My Generation: 4G
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
Well, google
As I have noticed, there are some Skunk2 haters out there in the world. Don't know why. And there's always a battle "ATR vs Skunk2", as I have seen in forums. So be aware.
And it is a very difficult question. It depends very much on your engine build. When I was thinking what to buy, I found a dyno chart proved (I pretty sure, it was long ago, I might mix something) thread about an average or heavy built H22 tested with ATR and Skunk2 intakes. What I remember really good - ATR showed lower results. They blamed it's size. I am pretty sure Skunk2 was opened, ported, and welded back... But it's only his case. So I bought Skunk2
I got it cheap (another reason why), for ~120 pounds, used, but looked like new.
If your engine is standard, it might be better to get ATR intake, or it might be the same results as Skunk2, don't know. Either way you'll need to change you ecu and map it on dyno. Maybe anyone here have tested and have dyno chart pictures?

And it is a very difficult question. It depends very much on your engine build. When I was thinking what to buy, I found a dyno chart proved (I pretty sure, it was long ago, I might mix something) thread about an average or heavy built H22 tested with ATR and Skunk2 intakes. What I remember really good - ATR showed lower results. They blamed it's size. I am pretty sure Skunk2 was opened, ported, and welded back... But it's only his case. So I bought Skunk2

If your engine is standard, it might be better to get ATR intake, or it might be the same results as Skunk2, don't know. Either way you'll need to change you ecu and map it on dyno. Maybe anyone here have tested and have dyno chart pictures?
Yellow Dream made true.
- Froidas
- Posts: 253
- Joined: Mon Jan 30, 2012 11:11 am
- My Generation: 4G
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 1 time
2 ways:
1. There are 2 plates and 2 hoses included in the SKunk2 mani kit for the IACV (try to google). So it might be placed separately somewhere near manifold. I tried it, but didn't liked it.
2. Put it directly on the manifold, on the rear side of it. On my 4th gen I needed to transform it a little bit for clearance - modify connector. I have tried to put it without transformation, but there was only about 5 mm gap between the IACV connector and firewall.
1. There are 2 plates and 2 hoses included in the SKunk2 mani kit for the IACV (try to google). So it might be placed separately somewhere near manifold. I tried it, but didn't liked it.
2. Put it directly on the manifold, on the rear side of it. On my 4th gen I needed to transform it a little bit for clearance - modify connector. I have tried to put it without transformation, but there was only about 5 mm gap between the IACV connector and firewall.
Yellow Dream made true.