Better than google translate...
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 4:00 pm
PR-Experts, politicians, ad writers, scientists or Donald need to be strong here!
Lude Generation
The UK Honda Prelude Club
https://www.ludegeneration.co.uk/
Better than google translate...
Page 1 of 1
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 4:05 pm
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 4:06 pm
I did just check my milk analogy and I only scored a 0.1, must be some sense in there
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 4:06 pm
That could be useful
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 4:09 pm
Wurly this is terrible, I just tested Nafe's explanation of wheel offset (which was very comprehensive) and it was 0.4. 
What words is it picking out?
What words is it picking out?
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 4:19 pm
I don't know, but it can't be all bad...
"I have a dream" scored 0.09 (no indications)
Whereas Rumsfeld's "known unknows" speech scored 0.14 (a few indications)
and a random Sarah Palin speech scores 0.17
So it's clearly heading in the right direction!
I am wondering what will get it to score a very high level of BS though...
"I have a dream" scored 0.09 (no indications)
Whereas Rumsfeld's "known unknows" speech scored 0.14 (a few indications)
and a random Sarah Palin speech scores 0.17
So it's clearly heading in the right direction!
I am wondering what will get it to score a very high level of BS though...
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 4:21 pm
Well it would recognise any of the verses or chorus of Wanna be startin somethin so... 
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 4:28 pm
It must be working...
Carly Fiorina's speech explaining why the HP merger with Compaq was a good thing, scores 0.47;
"Something's getting a bit fishy. You probably want to sell something, or you're trying to impress somebody. It still may be an acceptable result for a scientific text"
I think maximum bullshit must be a score of 1!
Carly Fiorina's speech explaining why the HP merger with Compaq was a good thing, scores 0.47;
"Something's getting a bit fishy. You probably want to sell something, or you're trying to impress somebody. It still may be an acceptable result for a scientific text"
I think maximum bullshit must be a score of 1!
Posted: Thu Mar 06, 2014 4:55 pm
The removal of existing and exactly from a block of text both dropped the rating by 0.1 when removed individually, but combined it remained at a 0.1 drop.