Post
by judderod » Mon Mar 18, 2013 11:33 pm
I'm surprised some of you think this is acceptable. You're far more compliant than me! My perception of autoglass based on their advertising is that you should call them if you have a chipped windscreen and they'll come out and fix it, usually free. They also say it's an easy, quick and simple repair. Unless it was made clear to me before I booked someone to come out that it might NOT be an easy, quick and simple repair, then I'd feel misled (even if I was made aware of this at a later stage before they started the job, since I might not have gone ahead in the first place if I'd have known).
It's their job to do what they say they're going to do. If they mess up in the process, it should be their responsibility to sort it out. I understand glass is a pig to work with but that's not the consumer's problem, it's the tech's/companies. And it's their decision to work with it. Passing responsibility for repairing the damage they caused isn't fair in my opinion. But maybe it's just my legal experience talking.
If I said to one of my customers 'I'm going to fix this for you and it will be quick and simple', and they agree but I later turn around and say, 'ahh actually I can't fix it because...', that's bad but acceptable/understandable. If I turn around and say 'yyyyyeah I can't fix it and actually what I've gone and done is completely smashed what I was trying to fix soooo, you can't use the whole thing anymore. Oh and by they way its YOU who'll need to pay to get that fixed. See you later!', that's just wrong and probably illegal.