Congratulations to vtecmec for winning May/June's Lude Of The Month, with his DIY Turbo BB1 build.

>>> Click Here For Profile <<<

Image

Fact or fiction - final drives

Engine/Gearbox questions and discussion
newkid
Supporter 2016
Posts: 2665
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:28 pm
My Generation: 4G
PSN GamerTag: spaz_ma_taz
Location: Edinburgh
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 50 times

Post by newkid » Wed Aug 10, 2016 8:30 pm

mercutio wrote:head mashed yet????
no lol

Right @rattymcclelland, @chrismc think I may have finally got my head around it, I've been calculating the 9.19% on just the per 1000rpm meaning you only gained 92rpm per 1000rpm BUT it should have also been gaining a further 9.19% on the 92etc for the next 1000rpm to 2000rpm and then a further 9.19% on the 192 for the 2000 to 3000rpm so like below

4.266 v 4.66 = 9.19% increase in acceleration

4.266@1000 = 5mph
4.64@1092 = 5mph
4.266@2000 = 10mph
4.64@2192 = 10mph
4.266@3000 = 15mph
4.64@3293 = 15mph
4.266@4000 = 20mph
4.64@4394 = 20mph
4.266@5000 = 25mph
4.64@5496 = 28mph
4.266@6000 = 30mph
4.64@6597 = 31mph
4.266@7000 = 35mph
4.64@7698 = 36mph

If this is the correct maths based on rate of acceleration (+9.19%) for 4.266 and 4.64 you reach a slightly higher speed
Last edited by newkid on Wed Aug 10, 2016 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
RattyMcClelland
Moderator
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:02 pm
My Generation: 5G
PSN GamerTag: RattyMcClelland
Location: Leicestershire
Been thanked: 203 times

Post by RattyMcClelland » Wed Aug 10, 2016 8:42 pm

I think you go it. It's so difficult to explain but I think you're getting there. Your math looks great and those speeds look about right. 8-)
Image

Dino
Posts: 1692
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 1:30 pm
My Generation: 4G
Location: Monmouth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times

Post by Dino » Thu Aug 11, 2016 6:38 pm

Ive done final drives a few times.

Had an m2b4 with 4.266 best i ran was a 13.7 at 103mph
Nothing else changed i ran an m2f5 with 4.64 and ran a 13.5 1/4 at 108mph

I know they are two different boxes but deffo had gains.
Along the 1/4 mile i never got out of 4th gear in both boxes.

However on circuits you may have a few more gear changes with the shorter box. More changes mean more time. Eg 0.2s a gear change.
But you have more access to torque with a shorter box.

Also you cant compare times between two DIFFERENT cars as too many variables, eg weight, power, aerodynamics, tyre pressures, track conditions, weather conditions just to name a few

User avatar
wurlycorner
Ye are glad to be dead, RIGHT?
Posts: 21493
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:33 pm
My Generation: 4G
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Has thanked: 2481 times
Been thanked: 306 times

Post by wurlycorner » Mon Aug 15, 2016 7:59 pm

RattyMcClelland wrote:So if you have a final ratio of say 4.11 then that means that the for every 4.1 turns of the drive shaft the wheels will do one full turn.
Not caught up with this thread, but just to note... that is cobblers for a fwd car - the drive shaft makes exactly the same number of turns as the wheel, because they are directly connected.
I'm guessing that statement was taken from a yank forum, where they were talking about a rwd car with ancient technology live rear axle, meaning the drive shaft is between the gearbox and the diff (rather than even being a modern rear diff with driveshafts setup) ;)

User avatar
RattyMcClelland
Moderator
Posts: 9208
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:02 pm
My Generation: 5G
PSN GamerTag: RattyMcClelland
Location: Leicestershire
Been thanked: 203 times

Post by RattyMcClelland » Mon Aug 15, 2016 8:05 pm

It's just worded wrong. Was meant to be for every xx turn the final drive does, the wheel does xx turn.
But yes copied and pasted.
Image

Post Reply

Return to “Engine / GearBox”