If you get a Jazz whatever you do, do not buy one with the ishift gearbox. That is the single shittest gearbox that has ever been fitted to a Honda, they're very difficult to drive smoothly unless you body lemonade about constantly trying to anticipate shift points. Apparently it has a 'learning' ECU for the gearbox also, which roughly translates into they drive even worse when somebody other than the regular driver uses it. They don't hold their value as a result because nobody likes them - sold a lot of new Jazz's because people wanted to get rid of the gearbox on their old one
On the other hand, both the manual and CVT boxes are lovely. I've done thousands of miles in a Jazz and I really liked it as a car. They're not exciting but they do the job of being a practical car very admirably. They've got a jobby ton of cup holders too
imo the Jazz is better than the Civic, they don't feel smaller inside and they're very economical.
Is the sport really a 2.0?? I thought they were a 1.6 3dr, only the type-s and type-r were 2 litre lumps? I could be (read: probably) wrong though
Also, thinking about it I'd lean towards the Jazz as being more likely to have had an easier life than a car marketed as a 'sport'. You never know though
would that be a 1.3 or would they call it a 1.4?)
You didn't look at the dashboard before you bought the car? The car has a serious flaw because you're red/green colour blind? 
Not always SFW
