expensive lude

Crazy_C · Post by **Crazy_C** » Tue Aug 20, 2013 10:46 pm

You think that's expensive, this was up for $45k a few years ago!!!!

[youtube]fCNsQ1e4fro[/youtube]

Post by **indigolemon** » Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:38 am

The exhaust that looks like a flaccid penis is not an amazing design decision either

bb1boy · Post by **bb1boy** » Wed Aug 21, 2013 9:53 am

Someone submit that to Shed of the day!

Froidas · Post by **Froidas** » Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:35 am

I think I won't understand show cars, ever. They are all the same - as many TV's as possible, as many audio components as possible, big wheels, big body kit, any non standard colour and interior. That's it.

Do they earn 10x more money they spent for shows or what?

bb1boy · Post by **bb1boy** » Wed Aug 21, 2013 10:46 am

Froidas wrote:Do they earn 10x more money they spent for shows or what?

No I don't think so. But it does make sense now why people do this stuff to 2.3's or 2.0 Auto's and not the VTEC's - most of these show cars look to be pretty much undriveable around the roads in the UK.

Froidas · Post by **Froidas** » Wed Aug 21, 2013 11:12 am

They are undriveable at all, because after drive your exhaust header will change colour, you'll catch some dusts and dirt

So I think they choose as cheep base platform as possible.

Well, I guess I would partly understand these show cars, if watchers and makers would be less than 16 years old

89 UKDM BA4 4WS (resto job!) · Post by **wurlycorner** » Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:28 pm

But again to be fair, it does look to have been done to a pretty high standard.

Why have so many 4th gens been unfortunate enough to be picked on for this treatment though???