I'm not making any point about whether it was/wasn't/did/didn't happen/is/isn't terrible etc. (I don't know enough about japanese history tbh) I just find the ability to 'spin' to such extremes rather interesting!
Mr Tamogami believes that Japan did not invade the Korean Peninsula, but rather "invested in Korea and also in Taiwan and Manchuria".


I ask him about the invasion of China in 1937 and the massacre of civilians in the capital Nanjing. Surely that was naked aggression?
"I can declare that there was no Nanjing Massacre," he says, claiming there were "no eyewitnesses" of Japanese soldiers slaughtering Chinese civilians.


So are we to conclude that successful massacres never happen, only unsuccessful ones?