Congratulations to vtecmec for winning May/June's Lude Of The Month, with his DIY Turbo BB1 build.
>>> Click Here For Profile <<<

>>> Click Here For Profile <<<

Fact or fiction - final drives
-
- Supporter 2016
- Posts: 2665
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:28 pm
- My Generation: 4G
- PSN GamerTag: spaz_ma_taz
- Location: Edinburgh
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 50 times
Fact or fiction - final drives
Was back up at Crail today with the bb1 with @vanzep
Now the car has the a8 engine converted to obd1, type-s/a8 intake, fujitusbo mani/downpipe, greddy evo 2, rob spoon chip, lightened flywheel, 4.64 final drive, think that's it for performance related items re power.
Now based on my tyre size of 205/50/16 and the fact the 4.64 final drive is in a m2f5 this is the figures mfactory give re speeds per gear @7500
1st 3.307 35mph
2nd 1.95 59mph
3rd 1.36 85mph
4th 1.071 108mph
5th 0.87 133mph
Now same info on our own calculator gives these figures
1st 3.307 32.3mph
2nd 1.95 54.7
3rd 1.36 78.5
4th 1.071 99.6
5th 0.87 122.6
As you can see there's a huge difference between what ours says and what mfactory claim, mfactory claimed numbers are actually that of a 4.266 final drive
Now based on today's runs I believe comparing my times an speeds that our calculator is the accurate one, this means even tho the gears are the same length as these haven't changed that a lower speed is achieved even tho you accelerate at the same rate in a like for like car. Basically what I'm saying is by the time both cars reach the 1/4 mile the car with the 4.266 will have achieved a higher max speed v the car with the 4.64.
This leads me to believe that the information giving is fiction but
on the other hand both cars are @ 50mph and in the same gear, the car with the shorter final drive will accelerate quicker than that of the larger final drive as its 400rpm up the rev range so higher up the power band.
Thoughts and info would be appreciated as I'm starting to think fitting a final drive on a road car wasn't the right move.
Now the car has the a8 engine converted to obd1, type-s/a8 intake, fujitusbo mani/downpipe, greddy evo 2, rob spoon chip, lightened flywheel, 4.64 final drive, think that's it for performance related items re power.
Now based on my tyre size of 205/50/16 and the fact the 4.64 final drive is in a m2f5 this is the figures mfactory give re speeds per gear @7500
1st 3.307 35mph
2nd 1.95 59mph
3rd 1.36 85mph
4th 1.071 108mph
5th 0.87 133mph
Now same info on our own calculator gives these figures
1st 3.307 32.3mph
2nd 1.95 54.7
3rd 1.36 78.5
4th 1.071 99.6
5th 0.87 122.6
As you can see there's a huge difference between what ours says and what mfactory claim, mfactory claimed numbers are actually that of a 4.266 final drive
Now based on today's runs I believe comparing my times an speeds that our calculator is the accurate one, this means even tho the gears are the same length as these haven't changed that a lower speed is achieved even tho you accelerate at the same rate in a like for like car. Basically what I'm saying is by the time both cars reach the 1/4 mile the car with the 4.266 will have achieved a higher max speed v the car with the 4.64.
This leads me to believe that the information giving is fiction but
on the other hand both cars are @ 50mph and in the same gear, the car with the shorter final drive will accelerate quicker than that of the larger final drive as its 400rpm up the rev range so higher up the power band.
Thoughts and info would be appreciated as I'm starting to think fitting a final drive on a road car wasn't the right move.
- RattyMcClelland
- Moderator
- Posts: 9208
- Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 10:02 pm
- My Generation: 5G
- PSN GamerTag: RattyMcClelland
- Location: Leicestershire
- Been thanked: 203 times
The shorter final drive will get to it's top speed quicker than the longer fd. However the shorter fd will have a lower top speed.
Final drives have no effect on gear ratios. They are always the same however the speed at certain ratios is now changed on the shorter drive.
The revs counter are very inaccurate and same as the Speedo so comparing to mfactorys ratios can be difficult.
What this video at 4.30 secs.
[youtube]es1RKcW_tSA[/youtube]
Final drives have no effect on gear ratios. They are always the same however the speed at certain ratios is now changed on the shorter drive.
The revs counter are very inaccurate and same as the Speedo so comparing to mfactorys ratios can be difficult.
What this video at 4.30 secs.
[youtube]es1RKcW_tSA[/youtube]

-
- Supporter 2016
- Posts: 2665
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:28 pm
- My Generation: 4G
- PSN GamerTag: spaz_ma_taz
- Location: Edinburgh
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 50 times
Ok here is some calculations, I've used another calculator which is working the speeds out the same as the mfactory one
Car 1 (vanzep)
h22a, a8 cams, a8/type-s air box, spoon chipped ecu, plm mani, 2.5 catback 4.266 running 205/55/15
@7500 vtec stay in vtec
38 25
64 43 no
92 61 yes
117 78 yes
159 106 yes
@7200 vtec stay in vtec
36 25
61 43 no
88 61 just
112 78 yes
152 106 yes
Car 2 (mine)
h22a8, a8/type-s air box, spoon chipped ecu, fujitsubo mani, 2.36 catback, 4.64 running 205/50/16
@ 7500 vtec stay in vtec
35 23
59 40 no
85 57 yes
108 72 yes
133 89 yes
@7200 vtec stay in vtec
34 23
57 40 no
82 57 just
104 72 yes
128 89 yes
1/4 mile bests on the day
Car 1 14.8 @ 98.3
Car 2 15.1 @ 92.4
Now going by what everyone says with the final drive I should be reaching my top speeds quicker, yet as you can clearly see the longer final drive is reaching far higher speeds, this was the same no matter what times were achieved.
So going by this its either
1 my a8 is producing really crap numbers
2 a bb1 weighs alot more than a bb4
3 something is holding my car back
4 mfactory talk a load of rubbish
My research does show the greddy is meant to have a bottleneck where it joins to the cat as that join is meant to be 2" but surely that cant make me lose that much speed/time.
Ratty haven't dismissed the video you put up but it does say they lightened the nsx-r by 120Kg
so thats going to make a huge difference come power to weight.
Car 1 (vanzep)
h22a, a8 cams, a8/type-s air box, spoon chipped ecu, plm mani, 2.5 catback 4.266 running 205/55/15
@7500 vtec stay in vtec
38 25
64 43 no
92 61 yes
117 78 yes
159 106 yes
@7200 vtec stay in vtec
36 25
61 43 no
88 61 just
112 78 yes
152 106 yes
Car 2 (mine)
h22a8, a8/type-s air box, spoon chipped ecu, fujitsubo mani, 2.36 catback, 4.64 running 205/50/16
@ 7500 vtec stay in vtec
35 23
59 40 no
85 57 yes
108 72 yes
133 89 yes
@7200 vtec stay in vtec
34 23
57 40 no
82 57 just
104 72 yes
128 89 yes
1/4 mile bests on the day
Car 1 14.8 @ 98.3
Car 2 15.1 @ 92.4
Now going by what everyone says with the final drive I should be reaching my top speeds quicker, yet as you can clearly see the longer final drive is reaching far higher speeds, this was the same no matter what times were achieved.
So going by this its either
1 my a8 is producing really crap numbers
2 a bb1 weighs alot more than a bb4
3 something is holding my car back
4 mfactory talk a load of rubbish
My research does show the greddy is meant to have a bottleneck where it joins to the cat as that join is meant to be 2" but surely that cant make me lose that much speed/time.
Ratty haven't dismissed the video you put up but it does say they lightened the nsx-r by 120Kg

- wurlycorner
- Ye are glad to be dead, RIGHT?
- Posts: 21493
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:33 pm
- My Generation: 4G
- Location: Chelmsford, Essex
- Has thanked: 2481 times
- Been thanked: 306 times
There will be quite a weight difference between your bb1 and vanzeps bb4. The standard cars are 1240kg (bb4) and 1315kg (bb1) nb: those are unofficial figures from carfolio, because I don't have access to the service manual right now....
Plus, vanzep has lightened the car a fair bit with carbon bonnet (and air-con removal etc iirc?)
So there's quite a difference there.
The PLM Mani is meant to be the best and he has a bigger exhaust, so, I'm not too surprised his was faster on the quarter mile?
If you were to go up against a standard bb1, yours would be faster I'm sure.
I wonder how well an a8 runs under a spoon chipped 4th gen ECU?
Would be interesting to see yours against vanzeps on the same dyno?
Plus, vanzep has lightened the car a fair bit with carbon bonnet (and air-con removal etc iirc?)
So there's quite a difference there.
The PLM Mani is meant to be the best and he has a bigger exhaust, so, I'm not too surprised his was faster on the quarter mile?
If you were to go up against a standard bb1, yours would be faster I'm sure.

Would be interesting to see yours against vanzeps on the same dyno?
--
Iain.
Iain.
Super Secret 1G (not really super secret!)
-
- Supporter 2016
- Posts: 2665
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:28 pm
- My Generation: 4G
- PSN GamerTag: spaz_ma_taz
- Location: Edinburgh
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 50 times
Ok I'll put it another way.
Say both cars are 200bhp and both weigh 1000kg. Infact everything is the same except the final drive. Now this means the gears are the exact same length as the final drive doesn't effect the ratios.
Surely that means both cars will accelerate at the same rate from a standing start?
If that's correct then the car with the longer final drive will reach a higher speed per gear?
Say both cars are 200bhp and both weigh 1000kg. Infact everything is the same except the final drive. Now this means the gears are the exact same length as the final drive doesn't effect the ratios.
Surely that means both cars will accelerate at the same rate from a standing start?
If that's correct then the car with the longer final drive will reach a higher speed per gear?
- 4thgenphil
- Supporter 2016
- Posts: 6661
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 4:15 pm
- My Generation: 4G
- Location: filming two girls one cup 2
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 29 times
-
- Supporter 2016
- Posts: 2665
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 8:28 pm
- My Generation: 4G
- PSN GamerTag: spaz_ma_taz
- Location: Edinburgh
- Has thanked: 13 times
- Been thanked: 50 times
Both in 4th.
Surely if both cars are identical in everyway except the final drive then from stationary they accelerate at the same rate. Both reach 4000rpm, 6000rpm etc. If this is right then the longer final drive is reaching a higher speed in every gear.
The only advantage I can see is if both cars approached a corner at the same speed and had to drop a gear. The shorter final drive will then put you 400rpm up the powerband giving you the advantage.
Surely if both cars are identical in everyway except the final drive then from stationary they accelerate at the same rate. Both reach 4000rpm, 6000rpm etc. If this is right then the longer final drive is reaching a higher speed in every gear.
The only advantage I can see is if both cars approached a corner at the same speed and had to drop a gear. The shorter final drive will then put you 400rpm up the powerband giving you the advantage.
- mercutio
- LotM Winner
- Posts: 14958
- Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:45 pm
- My Generation: 5G
- Location: Sunny Manchester
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 4 times
- Contact:
you pretty much have it on a track the car with the shorter final drive will win but will be buzzing up and down the box in a drag race the longer final drive will be better as less gearchanges/hold the gear for longer well thats how i understand it
bristol_bb4 wrote:ahhh a 5th gen, i love 5th gens![]()
Dino wrote:I loves the 5th gen really.... just dont quote me on it...
4thgenphil wrote:Mines 4 1/4 unches mate, sorry
http://www.ludegeneration.co.uk/profile ... -t618.html
- vanzep
- Supporter 2016
- Posts: 7142
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:38 pm
- My Generation: 4G
- Location: Edinburgh
- Has thanked: 305 times
- Been thanked: 504 times
im happy to do this if your payingDrax wrote:i'd say weigh both cars at the same place, and get them dyno'd at the same rolling road, then go from there - it would be good research

there are a few other things to consider - some already mentioned by wurly etc
a)you have a larger spoiler - creating a bit more drag
b)your engine has just had a manual tensioner conversion done so belts will be very tight and creating a bit of drag
c)fujitsubo manifold with 2.375 piping vs plm with 2.5" piping
d)your car may be marginally heavier with sunroof/16" wheels/300mm front brakes
I wouldnt expect the H22A8 engine to offer much more power vs H22A1
I dont think there is anything to be disappointed about as i think all the money/time spent on building your gearbox will pay dividends out on track or on twisty B roads

1996-2000 1993 EG9 Blue Civic 1.6 Vti - Traded in against the BB4
2000-2019 1994 2WS BB4 Milano Red JDM Prelude Si VTEC LSD
2015 on > 1991 4WS BB1 Phantom Pearl Grey JDM Prelude Si VTEC LSD
2021 ON > 1998 2WS BB6 White Pearl JDM Prelude Si VTEC
2000-2019 1994 2WS BB4 Milano Red JDM Prelude Si VTEC LSD
2015 on > 1991 4WS BB1 Phantom Pearl Grey JDM Prelude Si VTEC LSD
2021 ON > 1998 2WS BB6 White Pearl JDM Prelude Si VTEC