Congratulations to vtecmec for winning May/June's Lude Of The Month, with his DIY Turbo BB1 build.

>>> Click Here For Profile <<<

Image

Buying a motorway cruiser

Banter goes here, and doesn't have to be Lude related
User avatar
wurlycorner
Ye are glad to be dead, RIGHT?
Posts: 21496
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:33 pm
My Generation: 4G
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 307 times

Post by wurlycorner » Thu Sep 25, 2014 11:59 am

Is this travelling up/down once a week?
Personally I think I'd get back several hours of my life each time, by flying!
Then either walk/use public transport around Brum while I was there, or if a car was needed, buy some cheapy thing to live in Brum that I could use there during the week and abandon at the weekend.
Cheaper, way less stressful/tiring/boring etc.

vtecred
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:34 pm
My Generation: 5G

Re: Buying a motorway cruiser

Post by vtecred » Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:31 pm

I was alternatively thinking of that but if the cost of diesel will be cheaper then so be it lol!!

User avatar
Confused
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 11:44 am
My Generation: 4G
Location: Notts / Essex
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 11 times
Contact:

Post by Confused » Thu Sep 25, 2014 12:59 pm

With FlyBe, taking a random date sample a Monday flight out, and a Friday flight back, you're looking at around £50 each way.

Probably similar to driving, but a much more relaxed experience, as well as a HUGE difference in time.

User avatar
wurlycorner
Ye are glad to be dead, RIGHT?
Posts: 21496
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:33 pm
My Generation: 4G
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 307 times

Post by wurlycorner » Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:03 pm

Yep, the only drag is the bollocks security you have to go through and all the time that shenanigans wastes. But would still save you about 2 hours each way, even after that.
No contest for me.

User avatar
indigolemon
The Chaos Engine
Posts: 6680
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:45 pm
My Generation: 4G
PSN GamerTag: M149YSL
Location: Kelty, Fife
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 71 times
Contact:

Post by indigolemon » Thu Sep 25, 2014 1:48 pm

Given you need to be there an hour before to check in, and are then subject to delays, I'm unsure the overall time would be any different. Is rail an option?
'On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.' - Charles Babbage

User avatar
Confused
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 11:44 am
My Generation: 4G
Location: Notts / Essex
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 11 times
Contact:

Post by Confused » Thu Sep 25, 2014 2:00 pm

Even if flying isn't any *quicker* overall, it's a lot less hassle than driving. Driving those distances is the last thing I'd want to be doing at the beginning and end of a working week.

With flying, you can read, watch a film, wander around the airport and get a coffee, or even sleep. You can't do any of that in the car.

Either that, or the train. Same advantages as plane, but possibly still not as quick.

User avatar
indigolemon
The Chaos Engine
Posts: 6680
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 1:45 pm
My Generation: 4G
PSN GamerTag: M149YSL
Location: Kelty, Fife
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 71 times
Contact:

Post by indigolemon » Thu Sep 25, 2014 2:15 pm

Confused wrote:Even if flying isn't any *quicker* overall, it's a lot less hassle than driving. Driving those distances is the last thing I'd want to be doing at the beginning and end of a working week.

With flying, you can read, watch a film, wander around the airport and get a coffee, or even sleep. You can't do any of that in the car.

Either that, or the train. Same advantages as plane, but possibly still not as quick.
I agree entirely, I think business travel has just sickened me of airports :lol:
'On two occasions I have been asked, 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able rightly to apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question.' - Charles Babbage

User avatar
wurlycorner
Ye are glad to be dead, RIGHT?
Posts: 21496
Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 3:33 pm
My Generation: 4G
Location: Chelmsford, Essex
Has thanked: 2483 times
Been thanked: 307 times

Post by wurlycorner » Thu Sep 25, 2014 3:10 pm

Airports suck.
Flying is a faff. Train is FAR simpler/easier
But...
The driving time is 4.5 hours (assuming roads clear!)
In this case, the train time is still around 4 hours :( so although it's safer and more productive/relaxing, it doesn't actually save time or probably, money.
The flight time is about 1hr 10 mins, so allowing 1.5 hours for all the check in/boarding bollocks (more than sufficient on a short internal flight with only hand luggage and on-line check in?) and then half an hour to get out the other end, you're still saving well over an hour.

HS2 FTW, when it arrives!!!

Online
User avatar
Merlin
Moderator
Posts: 12394
Joined: Fri Aug 06, 2010 9:04 am
My Generation: 5G
PSN GamerTag: Merlinbadman
Location: Edinburgh
Has thanked: 69 times
Been thanked: 303 times

Post by Merlin » Thu Sep 25, 2014 5:13 pm

Damn it I want a Rover 75 as a winter car now :oops:
Image
BA8......... BB4......... BB8.........The JDM Muscle Bus

User avatar
Doggo
Court Jester
Posts: 2895
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:26 pm
My Generation: 5G
PSN GamerTag: FfyreDog
Location: Glasgow

Post by Doggo » Thu Sep 25, 2014 6:11 pm

indigolemon wrote:The Saab 9-3's (1.9) are Fiat based engines I believe, they're very good. The 2.2 is a GM lump, from a tractor, from 1950.
For a monstrous Burn, that's unusually low key.

Post Reply

Return to “General Chat”