Donald wrote:Have you seen newkid's pics?
Errm, yeah, otherwise how could I have said this?
wurlycorner wrote:There's bugger-all damage at the lip on newkids car, all the damage is above that, in the hollow, so there will be bugger all damage to the inner wing as a result.
Specifically, this pic is the only one;
That is absolutely drokk all damage to the rear wing lip, as I've said above.
In fact, the more I look at it... The more you can see that the only place where the inner and outer wing are joined (the bottom fold) isn't actually deformed at all, it's only the out wing crease line above that, that is.
4th gen and 5th gen rear quarters are constructed in the same way as each other. (As are Civics, Accords etc of the same era - all the same.)
nb: this isn't about a detailed understanding of physics (transfer of forces), it's about a practical understanding of the way the thing is put together, which bits are structural and which bits are niff/naff and how car body panels behave when they're deformed and what's required to sort it. So ner
Are you telling me that if someone like... say, Phil went up and gave the rear panel on a 5th gen a massive boot (for which he would achieve a far bigger dent than that) that he'd structurally damage the car in a way that it was unsafe to repair?
Bullshit...