



cheers Jon
Needed a car quick, or needed a quick car? Lolsi import wrote: the main reason i brought it was i needed a car quick at the time.
Cheers matejjmartin349571 wrote:I love itgood buy mate.
Both really lol. Yeah they are thirsty. I would actually say a noticeable amount more than the lude aswelllwurlycorner wrote:Needed a car quick, or needed a quick car? Lolsi import wrote: the main reason i brought it was i needed a car quick at the time.
Out of interest, what's the fuel economy like on one of those, running it as a daily. Heard they were thirsty but wonder if they're any worse than a lude?
Cheers mate. The classics are defiantly my favourite .paul bristol uk wrote:Nice car! I have had 4 over the years and that Model/year was bomb proof!
NafemanNathan wrote:Never driven one, but I do like them... Especially the exhaust note
My red Lude sounded like one for a short time... It was running on two cylinders at the time though
Yeah do love the sound of them .nothing else the same . Not a fan of the big rally stickers on them eitherNafemanNathan wrote:Also, glad to see it isn't a "sticker bombed" version